MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039105622 · doi:10.1364/oe.397683

Wide-range strain sensor based on Brillouin frequency and linewidth in an As<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub>-PMMA hybrid microfiber

2020· article· en· W3039105622 on OpenAlexafffund
Haiyang Wang, Song Gao, Chams Baker, Yuan Wang, Liang Chen, Xiaoyi Bao

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsLaser linewidthMaterials scienceMicrofiberBrillouin zoneBrillouin scatteringOpticsOptical fiberComposite materialLaserPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a wide-range strain sensor based on Brillouin frequency and linewidth in a 50 cm-long As 2 Se 3 -polymethyl methacrylate (As 2 Se 3 -PMMA) hybrid microfiber with a core diameter of 2.5 µ m. The distributed information over the hybrid microfiber is measured by a Brillouin optical time-domain analysis (BOTDA) system. The wide dynamic range strain from 0 to 15000 µ ɛ is enabled by measuring the Brillouin frequency and linewidth due to the low Young’s modulus of As 2 Se 3 core and the high mechanical strength of PMMA cladding. The deformation of the As 2 Se 3 -PMMA hybrid microfiber is observed when the strain is greater than 1500 µ ɛ by measuring the distributed Brillouin frequency and Brillouin linewidth over the 50 cm-long hybrid microfiber. The measured errors based on the Brillouin frequency in the range of 0-1500 µ ɛ and 1500-15000 µ ɛ are 42 µ ɛ and 105 µ ɛ, respectively. The measured error based on the Brillouin linewidth is 65 µ ɛ at 0-1500 µ ɛ and the maximum error is 353 µ ɛ when the tensile strain is 15000 µ ɛ. No strain memory effect is observed compared with the polymer optical fiber due to Young’s modulus in As 2 Se 3 is larger than that in polymer. Numerical simulations are developed to accurately predict the strain dependence of Brillouin frequency in the As 2 Se 3 -PMMA hybrid microfiber.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207