The time in between: parenthood, ageing, and communication in Yuval Hadadi’s <i>15 Years</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this interview, I explore, with writer-director Yuval Hadadi, how his new film 15 Years (2019) furthers debate regarding parenthood and ageing for the LGBTQ community, how he envisions the two characters’ relationship having worked in the past, and how he sees them operating in the present. Hadadi began writing 15 Years in 2013, and by setting it in Tel Aviv, he returns home and examines how radically it has changed. 15 Years is a critical success. The film opened the TLVFest: The Tel Aviv International LGBT Film Festival, where it earned Best Actor (for Oded Leopold and Udi Persi). It has subsequently been screened at a number of festivals including the Omovies Film Festival, where it earned the Jury Prize for Best Feature Film, and the Chicago Gay and Lesbian International Film Festival, where it was named Best Narrative Feature. The film was released on DVD and VOD on 28 April 2020. This interview contributes to scholarship by attending to Hadadi’s contribution to LGBTQ cinema and by examining some of the new directions the genre is taking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".