CICLO DE APRENDIZAGEM E A PRODUÇÃO DE NOTÍCIAS JORNALÍSTICAS EM UM CONTEXTO ESCOLAR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo fundamenta-se teoricamente à Linguística Sistêmico-funcional de Halliday (2014) e à Pedagogia de Gêneros (Martin; Rose, 2008, 2012) e tem como objetivo apresentar a implementação do Ciclo de Aprendizagem com alunos do sexto ano do Ensino Fundamental em uma escola da rede pública. Buscou-se, dessa forma, evidenciar possíveis formas de aprendizagem explícita do gênero notícias, bem como a escrita autônoma de textos. A metodologia aplicada é estabelecida pelo Ciclo de Aprendizagem com alunos que frequentam o turno inverso para um projeto de letramento, oferecido por uma professora da rede municipal. Apresenta-se a análise da produção de um aluno e discute-se a influência da implementação do Ciclo no letramento dos alunos envolvidos.
 Ah duvido – O que são lendas urbanas. Disponível em: http://ahduvido.com.br/50-lendasurbanas. Acesso em: 11 abr 2016BRASIL. Ministério da Educação/Diretoria de Avaliação da Educação Básica (DAEB). Brasil no PISA 2015. Sumário Executivo, Brasília, DF, 2016BERNSTEIN, B. The structuring of pedagogic discourse. Routledge, 1990.BERNSTEIN, B. Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.BUTT, D.; FAHEY, R.; SPINKS, S. & ALLOP, C. Using Functional. Grammar: An Explorer's Guide. NationaL. Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Sidney: Claredon Printing, 2003.EGGINS, S. Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. New York/London: Continuum. 2014.GOUVEIA, C. A. M. Compreensão leitora como base instrumental do ensino da produção escrita. In: SILVA, W. R.; SANTOS, J. S.; MELO, M. A. (org.), Pesquisas em Língua(gem) e demandas do ensino básico. Campinas, Pontes Editores, p. 203-231, 2014HALLIDAY, M. A. K. An introduction to functional grammar. 5a ed. Revisada por MATTHIESSEN, C. M. I. M. London: Edward Arnold, 2014.HALLIDAY, M. A. K.; An introduction to functional grammar. 2ª ed. London E. Arnold, 1994.HALLIDAY, M. A. K. Language as social semiotics. 1978.HALLIDAY, M. A. K.; HASAN, R. Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. 1989.MARTIN, J. R. Grammar meets genre: Reflections on the “Sydney School”. Arts: the journal of the Sydney University Arts Association, 22, 47-95, 2000.MARTIN, J. R.; ROSE, D. Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Equinox, 2012.MARTIN, J. R.; ROSE, D. Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox, 2008PAINTER, C. Into the Mother Tongue: a case study of early language development, London, 1984.ROSE, D. Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the ‘Sydney School’ David Rose Artemeva, N & A Freedman (Eds.) 2015 Trends and traditions in genre studies. Alberta, Canada: Inkshed, 2015a.ROSE, D. New developments in genre-based literacy pedagogy David Rose In C A. MacArthur,S Graham, J Fitzgerald [Eds.] 2015 Handbook of Writing Research, 2nd Edition. New York: Guilford, 2015cROSE, D. Analysing pedagogic discourse: an approach from genre and register. Functional Linguistics, 2014. Disponível em https://www.readingtolearn.com.au/wpcontent/uploads/2016/01/Analysing-pedagogic-iscourse.pdf>. Disponível em 21 abr 2020.ROTHERY, J. Making changes: developing an educational linguistics. Hasan & Williams. 1996, p. 86-123.WHITE P. R. R. Telling Media Tales: The News Story as Rhetoric. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney. 1998.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".