KEBERADAAN PENGETAHUAN LOKAL MASYARAKAT TANI DI ERA REVOLUSI HIJAU (STUDI KASUS PETANI PADI DI DESA CAREBBU KECAMATAN AWANGPONE KABUPATEN BONE PROVINSI SULAWESI SELATAN)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractThis study aims to analyze the existence of indigenous knowledge of peasant society on farming management especially of rice land farming in The Village of Carebbu, Awangpone Sub-district, Bone Regency, South Sulawesi Province during April 2019. The method used in this study is descriptive qualitative and case study method with a sampling technique that used is purposive sampling and snowball sampling. Researcher use is an in-depth interview and analyzed by qualitative data analysis with the approach of the AGIL functional theory of Talcott Parson. This result shows if there is 8 indigenous knowledge that exists on peasant society from generation to generation on their farming management of paddy rice land, but in the middle of the green revolution, it shows that indigenous knowledge of peasant society is lost some, there are 2 of 8 indigenous knowledge has to begin to be left out. This is due to the thinking of the peasant society which began to change from irrational to rational.Key Words: Indigenous knowledge; farm society; green revolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".