<p>Neuro-Ophthalmological Manifestations of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Current Perspectives</p>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a disease of obstructed airways during sleep that significantly impacts the quality of life and increases the risk of various systemic diseases. OSA has been studied as a risk factor for a number of neuro-ophthalmic conditions and a strong relationship has been established with non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). The incidence of glaucoma and stroke have also been significantly associated with OSA and are conditions that may also be seen by neuro-ophthalmologists. Patients with NAION have a significantly higher incidence of OSA and OSA diagnosis significantly increases the risk for NAION development. Non-compliance with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in OSA patients has also been found to be a risk factor for fellow-eye involvement and there is increasing evidence to suggest that every patient with NAION should be formally evaluated with polysomnography. The relationship between OSA and idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) has also been studied, but the relationship between these two conditions is less clear. There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine eye examinations in OSA patients for papilledema and conducting a sleep study for a newly diagnosed IIH patient should be left to the discretion of the clinician based on other symptoms and risk factors of OSA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it