MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039778756 · doi:10.1101/2020.07.01.180729

Human bone mesoscale 3D structure revisited by plasma focused ion beam serial sectioning

2020· preprint· en· W3039778756 on OpenAlexaff
Dakota M. Binkley, Joseph Deering, Hui Yuan, Aurélien Gourrier, Kathryn Grandfield

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrofibrilLamellar structureMaterials scienceMineralization (soil science)NanometreCollagen fibrilFocused ion beamMesoscale meteorologyBiomedical engineeringChemistryBiophysicsIonComposite materialGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Visualizing bone mineralization and collagen microfibril organization at intermediate scales between the nanometer and the 100s of microns range, the mesoscale, is still an important challenge. Similarly, visualizing cellular components which locally affect the tissue structure requires a precision of a few tens of nanometers at maximum while spanning several tens of micrometers. To address this issue, we employed a plasma focused ion beam (PFIB) equipped with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to sequentially section nanometer-scale layers of demineralized and mineralized human femoral lamellar bone over volumes of approximately 46 × 40 × 9 μm 3 , and 29 × 26 × 9 μm 3 , respectively. This large scale view retained high enough resolution to visualize the collagen microfibrils while partly visualizing the lacuno-canalicular network (LCN) in three-dimensions (3D). We showed that serial sectioning can be performed on mineralized sections, and does not require demineralization. Moreover, this method revealed ellipsoidal mineral clusters, noted by others in high resolution studies, as a ubiquitous motif in lamellar bone over tens of microns, suggesting a heterogeneous and yet regular pattern of mineral deposition past the single collagen fibril level. These findings are strong evidence for the need to revisit bone mineralization over multi-length scales. Graphical Abstract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicAdvanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesFrench-language works237,207