PARTICIPAÇÃO E AUSÊNCIA FAMILIAR: IMPLICAÇÕES PARA O DESENVOLVIMENTO DE CRIANÇAS E ADOLESCENTES COM NECESSIDADES ESPECIAIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: to describe the participation of family members in clinical care and school monitoring of children and adolescents with special needs (CRIANES) from the perspective of health and education professionals from the Association of Parents and Friends of Exceptional People (APAE). Method: qualitative study, participatory type, where the production of data occurred through the development of the dynamics of creativity and sensitivity in the life line. Ten health and education professionals from the clinic and school participated in the dynamic, where the production took place through the metaphor of a clothesline that represented the life line of each professional in the face of the question that generates debate. The productions were phrases and drawings built individually and socialized in groups. The statements were audio recorded, transcribed and subjected to discourse analysis in the French current. Results: the productions and speeches highlighted the importance of the participation of families in favor of the development of the skills of children and adolescents and that the impact is positive even in adherence to treatment and care at home. Conclusion: health and education professionals realize the importance of the work they do with CRIANES. For them, the development process, the acquisition of skills and adherence to treatment will only be satisfactory with the collective efforts of the family, clinic and school in favor of the health and education of the CSHCN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.038 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".