MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039879918 · doi:10.1088/1361-6668/aba34e

Resistivity of REBCO tapes in overcritical current regime: impact on superconducting fault current limiter modeling

2020· article· en· W3039879918 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSuperconductor Science and Technology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersBundesamt für Energie
KeywordsElectrical resistivity and conductivityCurrent (fluid)Materials scienceFault (geology)AlgorithmSuperconductivityPhysicsCondensed matter physicsComputer scienceThermodynamicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A detailed knowledge of the resistivity of high-temperature superconductors in the overcritical current regime is important to achieve reliable numerical simulations of applications such as superconducting fault current limiters. We have previously shown that the combination of fast pulsed current measurements and finite element analysis allows accounting for heating effects occurring during the current pulses. We demonstrated that it is possible to retrieve the correct current and temperature dependence of the resistivity data points of the superconductor material. In this contribution, we apply this method to characterize the resistivity vs. current and temperature of commercial REBCO tapes in the overcritical current regime, between 77 and 90 K and in self-field conditions. The self-consistency of the overcritical resistivity model <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>I</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> is verified by comparing DC fault measurements with the results of numerical simulations using this model as input. We then analyze by numerical simulation to what extent using the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>I</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> model instead of the widely used power-law model <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>I</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> affects the thermal and electrical performance of the tapes in the practical case of a superconducting fault current limiter. A remarkable difference is observed between the measured overcritical current resistivity model <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>I</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> and the power-law resistivity model <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>I</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> . In particular, the simulations using the power-law model show that the device quenches faster than with the overcritical resistivity model. This information can be used to optimize the architecture of the stabilizer in superconducting fault current limiters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it