MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039894415 · doi:10.35248/2329-9096.20.08.552

Factors of Lower Limb Prosthesis and Orthosis User's Satisfaction in Amhara National Regional State Rehabilitation Center, Ethiopia: An Institution-Based Cross-Sectional Study

2020· article· en· W3039894415 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tesfa Kassa, Tamiru Dego, Jemal Suleyman, Endalkachew Dellie

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCross-sectional studyProsthesisLogistic regressionOdds ratioConfidence intervalRehabilitationPhysical therapyQuality of life (healthcare)Patient satisfactionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationNursingSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Prosthesis and orthosis are assistive devices used for different forms of cases. Lower limb prostheses and orthoses are very crucial to improve patient’s ability to walking, increased level of activity and participation to enhance their quality of life. However, there is limited knowledge of workplace variables that either satisfy or dissatisfy the prosthesis and orthosis users in the regional state, Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the satisfaction and associated factors among lower limb prosthesis and orthosis users in Amhara National Regional State Rehabilitation Center, Ethiopia. Methods: Institution based cross-sectional study was conducted from April 01 to May 30, 2019, at Amhara National Regional State Rehabilitation Center among lower limb prosthesis and orthosis users. Data were collected using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire by the standardized assessment tool; Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0). The study included a total of 207 participants. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, p value < 0.05 and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to identify the associated factors. Results: The study revealed that 56.5% (95% CI: 49.9-63.3) of lower limb prosthesis and orthosis users were satisfied. Experiencing pain (AOR: 5.56, 95%CI: 2.68-11.52), living in the rural area (AOR: 3.52, 95%CI: 1.51-8.21), use of prosthesis and orthosis devices on an average less than 9 hours (AOR=0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.80) and 9-12 hours in a day (AOR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.07-0.38) were factors significantly associated with satisfaction. Conclusion: The magnitude of lower limb prosthesis and orthosis users’ satisfaction was found to be relatively low. Therefore, healthcare providers and managers of the rehabilitation center need to emphasize on status of the client’s device throughout patient care in the management of clients’ pain and use of devices on an average hour per day.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Physical Medicine & RehabilitationSame topicAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityFrench-language works237,207