MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039926029 · doi:10.1002/ejoc.202000880

Functionalization of Bis‐Diazaphospholene P–P Bonds with Diverse Electrophiles

2020· article· en· W3039926029 on OpenAlexafffund
Blake S. N. Huchenski, Katherine N. Robertson, Alexander W. H. Speed

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganophosphorus compounds synthesis
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKillam Trusts
KeywordsElectrophileChemistryArylSubstituentRadicalBond cleavageAlkylMedicinal chemistryPhotochemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistryCombinatorial chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phosphorus‐sp 3 or ‐sp 2 carbon bonds are readily formed by the reaction of bis‐diazaphospholenes with several classes of electrophiles. These reactions result in cleavage of the phosphorus–phosphorus bond and formation of functionalized diazaphospholenes. The reactions proceed rapidly, without catalysis. Experimental evidence with aryl and alkyl halides suggests the intermediacy of radicals in some cases, however other evidence suggests either radical or polar mechanisms may be operative for certain substrates, with a dependence on reaction conditions. In three cases, the product aryl diazaphospholenes have been shown to transfer the aryl substituent to electrophiles. These results reveal that diazaphospholene dimers are potent participants in radical chemistry with organic substrates at room temperature without requiring chemical initiators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicOrganophosphorus compounds synthesisFrench-language works237,207