MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Faire de la recherche en collaboration

2007· book-chapter· fr· W3040009810 on OpenAlex
Paul Thagard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueÉditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En avril 1994, un groupe de 450 physiciens rassemblés à Fermilab ont présenté les preuves de l’existence du quark top, une construction théorique importante du Modèle Standard des particules et des forces. Bien que la taille de ce groupe soit inhabituelle, le travail que ses membres ont mené en collaboration ne l’est pas. Dans les sciences de la nature et dans les sciences sociales, la production de travaux par deux chercheurs en collaboration, ou davantage, est devenue la norme plutôt que l’...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.031
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.295
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it