MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3040167468 · doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000001575

The effect of menopause on metabolic syndrome: cross-sectional results from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

2020· article· en· W3040167468 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Marie K. Christakis, Haroon Hasan, Leanne R. De Souza, Lindsay Shirreff

Bibliographic record

VenueMenopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineMenopauseWaistMetabolic syndromeBody mass indexGlycated hemoglobinDyslipidemiaPoisson regressionRelative riskObesityDemographyInternal medicineObstetricsConfidence intervalDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyType 2 diabetesPopulationEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Data were examined from women surveyed in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging to evaluate whether menopause is an independent risk factor for the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS) or its components, including hypertension, central obesity, dyslipidemia, or elevated glycated hemoglobin. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of women aged 45-85 years old that participated in the baseline data of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging Comprehensive Cohort collected from 2012 to 2015. Modified Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to estimate the crude and adjusted relative risks (aRRs) of MetS in postmenopausal women compared to premenopausal women. RESULTS: Among 12,611 women analyzed, 10,035 (79.6%) had undergone menopause and 2,576 (20.4%) were premenopausal. Postmenopausal women were more likely to meet criteria for MetS compared to premenopausal women (32.6% vs 20.5%, P < 0.001). Using the MetS criteria with a lower waist circumference threshold, the prevalence of MetS was higher at 38.2% among postmenopausal women and 23.2% among premenopausal women (P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, body mass index, and other covariates, the occurrence of menopause was not associated with a significantly higher relative risk of MetS, using the unified criteria for MetS (aRR 1.09 [95% CI: 0.99-1.19]). Women with menopause had a significantly higher relative risk of MetS when using criteria with a lower waist circumference (aRR 1.10 [95% CI: 1.01-1.19]). Menopause was also associated with a higher risk of impaired glucose tolerance (aRR 1.42 [95% CI: 1.26-1.59]), elevated blood pressure (aRR 1.12 [95% CI: 1.03-1.21]), and elevated triglycerides (aRR 1.17 [95% CI: 1.08-1.26]). CONCLUSION: Menopause is associated with an increased risk of MetS, independent of age. Lifestyle interventions targeted at women with MetS are known to prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk. Perimenopause may be an important preventative care opportunity to assess metabolic risk factors and improve health and longevity of Canadian women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMenopause The Journal of The North American Menopause SocietySame topicMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207