MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3040342452 · doi:10.1002/hep4.1518

Real‐World Effectiveness of Obeticholic Acid in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis

2020· article· en· W3040342452 on OpenAlexaffabout
Surain B. Roberts, Marwa Ismail, Gowthami Kanagalingam, Andrew L. Mason, Mark G. Swain, Catherine Vincent, Eric M. Yoshida, Cynthia Tsien, Jennifer A. Flemming, Harry L.A. Janssen, Gideon M. Hirschfield, Bettina E. Hansen, Aliya Gulamhusein

Bibliographic record

VenueHepatology Communications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of OttawaUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of CalgaryUniversité de MontréalUniversity of AlbertaToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObeticholic acidMedicineUrsodeoxycholic acidInternal medicineGastroenterologyTolerabilityBilirubinClinical endpointAlkaline phosphataseCohortPlaceboPrimary biliary cirrhosisAlbuminClinical trialAdverse effectPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid are at risk of disease progression and need additional therapy. Obeticholic acid (OCA) was approved in Canada in May 2017, but its effectiveness in a real‐world setting has not been described. We sought to describe our experience with OCA in a Canadian cohort. OCA‐naive patients treated at two Canadian centers were included. Clinical and biochemical data were collected at OCA initiation and during follow‐up. Primary outcomes were changes in serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT), and total bilirubin (TB) over the duration of therapy. Secondary outcomes were changes in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), immunoglobulin M (IgM), platelets, and albumin; and achievement of the primary endpoint of the original phase 3 study that led to OCA approval (A Placebo‐Controlled Trial of Obeticholic Acid in Primary Biliary Cholangitis [POISE]), dose reductions, discontinuations, and tolerability. Repeated‐measures models were used to assess changes in biochemistry over time. Sixty‐four patients were included; 4 carried a diagnosis of overlap with autoimmune hepatitis. Mean age was 54.6 years, median ALP was 250 U/L, TB was 13 µmol/L, platelet count was 225 × 10 9 /L, and 24% had liver stiffness measurements ≥16.9 kPa. There was a significant reduction in mean ALP of 55 U/L ( P < 0.001), GGT of 138 U/L ( P < 0.001), ALT of 11.9 U/L ( P < 0.001), AST of 5.7 U/L ( P < 0.05), and IgM of 0.70 g/L ( P < 0.001) over 12 months; TB remained stable ( P = 0.98). Forty‐four patients met POISE‐inclusion criteria, 39% (n = 17) of whom had 12‐month biochemical measurements. In this subset, 18% (n = 3/17) met the 12‐month POISE primary endpoint, but considering follow‐up to 19 months, 43% achieved this target (n = 9/21). Pruritus was the most commonly reported complaint. Conclusion : Use of OCA was associated with improvement in biochemical surrogates of outcome in PBC in a real‐world setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHepatology CommunicationsSame topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207