Are psychological distress, substance misuse, and sexual sensation seeking associated with autoerotic asphyxiation-related distress?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autoerotic asphyxiation (AEA) involves enhancing sexual arousal by deliberately self-inducing a reduction of oxygen to the brain. Most studies of AEA have focused on those who have expressed distress or who have died from the practice. The present study explores correlates of AEA-related distress in a community sample, focusing on self-reported measures of psychological distress, substance misuse, and sexual sensation seeking. Individuals who expressed an interest in AEA ( n = 165) participated in an online anonymous survey. Findings revealed a significant positive association between AEA-related distress and symptoms of depression, and a significant negative association between AEA-related distress and sexual sensation seeking. Both depression and sexual sensation seeking remained associated with AEA-related distress at the multivariate level. The findings are consistent with prior literature on AEA that suggests comorbidity with depression and highlights the importance of psychological screening when people present to clinicians due to AEA, particularly for depression. Contrary to our hypothesis, those with higher sexual sensation seeking reported lower levels of AEA-related distress. Future research on AEA-related distress may benefit from using a sexual sensation seeking measure that better assesses sexual dysregulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".