Bee foraging preferences on three willow (<i>Salix</i>) species: Effects of species, plant sex, sampling day and time of day
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Our objective was to examine how bee foraging preferences on dioecious willows are influenced by plant sex, time of day, by sampling date on multiple sites and across different willow species. In a common garden experiment examining diurnal pollinator visitation patterns of Andrena bees (andrenids), there was a strong preference for male willow plants: 87% of visitations on male plants of Salix eriocephala (ERI) and 71% on males of S. interior (INT). The significant plant sex × time of day interaction was not a result of a change in bee preference for a certain plant sex during a certain part of the day but rather the result of diurnal changes in the magnitude of the preference of andrenid bees for male willow plants. Visits to male flower catkins were highest in the morning and early afternoon, peaking at midday. Visits to female catkins showed a more uniform, lower frequency visitation pattern throughout the day. In a larger field test at a reclaimed former coal mine site, which included S. cordata (COR) as well as ERI and INT, there were no sampling date × plant sex or sampling date × plant sex × willow species interactions. This indicates no plant sex switching behaviour by sampling date for the three willow species. Preference for male plants was greatest on the first sampling day and the proportion of male preference continued to decline until the fourth and final sampling day. On the mine site, 17 of the 25 Apoidea bee species identified were andrenids, and they represented 92% of the 744 individual bees collected while foraging on willow catkins. In addition, the overall number of observed and collected Apoidea bees visiting available flowering willow plants showed that the preference for male plants was 83%, 72% and 91%, for ERI, INT and COR, respectively. We discuss possibilities for promoting populations of native bees to increase commercial fruit and berry crop pollination by using willows as natural sources of pollen and nectar, thereby reducing costs of production associated with the annual importation of commercial bees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it