MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3040637097 · doi:10.1017/s143192760002852x

Characterization of Phase Transformation by Fe-SEM and Fe-TEM Analysis

2001· article· en· W3040637097 on OpenAlexaff
Paula Horny, Dominique Drouin, Raynald Gauvin, Gianluigi A. Botton

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy and Microanalysis · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor materials and interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSiliconSilicideBilayerNickelPhase (matter)Characterization (materials science)Etching (microfabrication)IrradiationElectronAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MetallurgyNanotechnologyChemistryLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The formation of a silicon alloy has been achieved by electron beam irradiation of a nickel-silicon bilayer. This process, called SiDWEL1, has been developed by Quantiscript. The nickel-silicon bilayer is very thin and the electron beam operates at low energy and current. Silicide formation occurred around the interaction volume of the electrons within the material. This paper describes the nature of the structures produced and the origin of the difficulties encountered with the characterization. The necessity of further analysis with TEM based techniques is highlighted. Figure 1 presents a cross-section of a typical sample. The growth of silicide grains is induced by the e-beam irradiation of the stack for few microseconds. Nucieation is initiated by the diffusion of silicon atoms in nickel grains, induced by the heating arising from the electron beam interaction with the solid. A new phase is revealed by FE-SEM observation, after wet etching of the nickel film, as shown in figures 2 and 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy and MicroanalysisSame topicSemiconductor materials and interfacesFrench-language works237,207