Natural history and outcomes of stage 3 retinopathy of prematurity persisting beyond 40 weeks of post‐menstrual age: Dilemma for treatment and follow up
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: To evaluate the natural history and outcomes of infants with stage-3 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) persisting beyond 40-weeks of post-menstrual age (PMA). BACKGROUND: There are no specific screening guidelines for stage-3 ROP persisting beyond 40 weeks of PMA. Persistent stage-3 disease in zone II without plus disease or in zone III with or without plus disease poses a dilemma for treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PARTICIPANT: Neonates with stage-3 ROP persisting beyond 40-weeks of PMA. METHODS: Demographic data and ROP parameters were collected. Univariate/multivariate analyses were utilized to assess risk factors associated with requiring treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluating the structural outcomes for infants with stage-3 ROP persisting beyond 40 weeks of PMA. RESULTS: Out of 2356 screened infants, 115 infants (4.9%, 172 eyes) met inclusion criteria. In 95 infants (139 eyes, 80.8%), ROP resolved spontaneously. Twenty-one infants (33 eyes, 19.2%) were treated with laser-photocoagulation; 16 eyes had reached type 1 ROP and 17 eyes had non-type 1 ROP. No eye had unfavourable structural outcome. On multiple regression, non-type 1 ROP with ≥2 continuous clock hours of persistent stage-3 temporally crossing the horizontal midline was a significant risk factor associated with receiving treatment (OR = 27.29, 95% CI = [1.61, 462.92], P = .0221). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The majority of stage-3 ROP persisting beyond 40-weeks of PMA resolve spontaneously. In eyes that do not reach type 1 ROP, ≥2 continuous clock hours of persistent stage-3 crossing the temporal horizontal midline and history of pre-plus were considered important risk factors for macular drag and treatment can be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".