Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, the issue of water is presented as an issue for technical cooperation that must be attended to in negotiations independent of other aspects of final settlement. To sustain such a framework for negotiation, each party must come to the table supported by domestic discourse, which is compatible with the envisioned settlement. While the Israeli public is primed to accept a settlement on water characterized by joint or cooperative management, the Palestinian public is not prepared to recognize such an agreement. Due to factors emanating from territorial dispossession and experience with the peace process, the discourse on the Palestinian side, however, has not undergone such a shift. In contrast, the Palestinians operate parallel discourses: one on the international stage of cooperation and another on the domestic stage of dispossession and rights-driven calls for “water sovereignty”. As it stands, this dual discourse renders unlikely the possibility of a negotiated settlement over a scarce resource. Based on this analysis, it may be necessary for third parties engaged in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process to develop strategies to address divergent discourse and accommodate Palestinian concerns into the negotiating framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it