MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3040857404

Vzpostavitev rodovniške knjige za pasmo ameriški quarter konj

2019· article· sl· W3040857404 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tamara Drobež

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana) · 2019
Typearticle
Languagesl
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)HumanitiesArtHistoryArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ameriski quarter konj je pasma, ki se je zacela razvijati v 17. stoletju. Vsak konj te pasme mora biti registriran pri American Quarter Horse Association, kot tudi v državi, v kateri se nahaja. Z Uredbo (EU) 2016/1012 … (2016) je potrebna prenova rejskih programov in vzpostavitev rodovniske knjige za vse pasme, ki se nahajajo v državi. Poleg tega mora vsakega konja pri prodaji spremljati zootehniski dokument. Prvi ameriski quarter konj je bil v Slovenijo pripeljan jeseni leta 1995. To je bil Future Enjoy, ki ima v Sloveniji registriranih 13 potomcev. Do julija 2019 je bilo v Sloveniji skotenih 452 ameriskih quarter konj, skupno registriranih pa kar 821. Za sprejem v rodovnisko knjigo je bilo pregledanih 38 od 115 kobil, ki izpolnjujejo osnovne pogoje. V letu 2019 je licenciranih 6 žrebcev pasme ameriski quarter konj. Linearno oceno, ki je potrebna za razvrscanje v pododdelke rodovniske knjige, je od leta 2015 naprej prejelo 73 ameriskih quarter konj. Predlagamo naslednjo obliko rodovniske knjige: tri glavne rodovniske knjige (Knjiga žrebcev, Knjiga Kobil in Knjiga kastratov in steriliziranih kobil), ki so naprej deljene na Osnovno knjigo, Splosno knjigo, Knjigo I in Knjigo II, poleg glavne knjige pa predlagamo se dodatni del.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1180.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.132
Teacher spread0.125 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)Same topicPlant Ecology and Taxonomy StudiesFrench-language works237,207