Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a collection of randomly selected ensemble members from 4 large ensemble projects:- <b>CanESM2</b> (http://data.ec.gc.ca/data/climate/scientificknowledge/the-eccc-climate-model-datasets-for-climate-science-and-impacts-research/the-canadian-earth-system-model-large-ensembles/)- <b>CESM-LENS</b> (http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/projects/community-projects/LENS/)- <b>GFDL </b>( http://poseidon.princeton.edu)- <b>MPI-GE </b>(https://mpimet.mpg.de/en/grand-ensemble/)<br>Each ensemble member was interpolated from its native grid to a 1x1 degree lat/lon grid. The variables are monthly over the 1982-2017 time frame and sampled as the SOCATv5 data product. Historical atmospheric CO2 is used up to 2005 with RCP8.5 after 2005. <br>The intention of this dataset is to evaluate ocean pCO2 gap-filling techniques. <br>Ensemble members from other large ensemble projects will be added to this dataset in the future. In total , there are 100 unique ensemble members across four large ensembles. Gap-filling techniques can be evaluated across 100 unique climate states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.116 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".