First Principle Investigation of Structural, Electronic and Optical Properties of Quaternary B<sub><i>x</i></sub>In<sub><i>y</i></sub>Ga1−x<sub>−<i>y</i></sub>N Compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report on our results obtained on the physical properties of BxInyGa[Formula: see text]N quaternary alloys in the zinc-blende phase that are thoroughly considered by the linearized augmented plane wave method, with a full potential within density functional theory, for different concentrations [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] as employed in the Wien2k code. We calculated the structural properties, including lattice constant [Formula: see text] and the bulk modulus [Formula: see text]. We computed as well the band structures, the dielectric constant and the refractive index of our quaternary alloys compounds. Finally, nonlinear dependence on the compositions [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are investigated in-depth and still expecting for experimental confirmations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first theoretical investigation of BxInyGa[Formula: see text]N alloy conducted to date.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".