Machine Learning Applied to SRV Modeling, Fracture Characterization, Well Interference and Production Forecasting in Low Permeability Reservoirs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The objective of this paper is to develop predictive models to optimize the (1) characterization of the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV), (2) discretization of the fracture network, and (3) hydraulic fracturing modeling, by combining machine learning (ML) algorithms and reservoir engineering in low permeability reservoirs. An unsupervised learning algorithm is implemented to characterize the fracture network developed by micro-seismic observations during hydraulic fracturing. A Self Organizing Map (SOM) and Multi-Attribute Analysis are performed on the available seismic data to map the extension of the hydraulic fracturing stages and the fracture network complexity in a low permeability reservoir. To correlate the mapped fracture network and discretized SRV, a 3D Finite Element Model (FEM) is developed to estimate fracture behavior, stress response, and hydraulic fracture propagation, on the predicted and forecasted multi-attribute map of the reservoir. A 3D hydraulic fracture propagation model (HFPM) is introduced, to delimit the fracture geometry and remove data outliers in the SOM algorithm. Unsupervised algorithms rely on data quality. The efficiency of hydraulic fracturing modeling is improved with a machine learning approach by refining the certainty and quality of the data. An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model helps to select the most significant parameters related to fracture modeling and simulation in the field. This approach allows us to recreate and forecast complex fracture networks in low permeability reservoirs, based on the learned geostatistical maps and hydraulic fracturing parameters, particularly where the microseismicity is limited or unavailable. To validate the implementation of the 3D-HFPM in the field, an earthquake model is compared with statistically significant microseismic events obtained by the unsupervised iso-cluster algorithm. The relationship showed a good agreement, which suggests the HFPM agrees with seismic observations in the field. The machine learning application to fracture network modeling provides the capability to identify susceptible areas to well interference and possible frac hits with higher certainty. This is so because the approach improves the selection of seismic data and hydraulic fracturing parameters, employed to develop the complex fracture network in numerical commercial reservoir simulators. This helps to determinate the reservoir interconnectivity and flow patterns in the fracture network. This approach presents a robust manner for characterizing the SRV using a relative fast methodology, based on the combination of geostatistical and unsupervised learning modeling. The seismicity and hydraulic fracturing are connected using a multi-attribute and multi-disciplinary interpretation. It is a powerful tool for characterizing problematic fracture networks in unconventional reservoirs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".