Participation-focused interventions for stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review protocol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this scoping review are to i) identify adaptive stroke rehabilitation interventions using metacognitive or self-management approaches targeting participation as an outcome; ii) determine the explicit and implicit theories underlying these interventions; and iii) ascertain the elements in each intervention. This review will develop a catalogue of these interventions, improving the understanding of how these interventions work, thereby facilitating efficient development and testing of participation-focused interventions. INTRODUCTION: Stroke rehabilitation interventions can be categorized as those aiming to correct impairment and those seeking participation improvement despite impairment. Impairment-focused interventions include a relatively small number of well-defined elements, generally based on motor learning or other types of learning theory. Participation-focused interventions span a large group of diverse interventions. The underlying theory is typically varied and often implicit, but many of these interventions are based on metacognitive or self-management approaches. An examination of the underlying theory and elements of participation-focused interventions would allow researchers to more effectively advance the science of these approaches. INCLUSION CRITERIA: The review will include published papers describing rehabilitation interventions using metacognitive or self-management approaches to improve participation among adults who have experienced a stroke. METHODS: The search will include JBI Evidence-Based Practice Database, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, OTSeeker, and PEDro databases. Studies will be selected according to a three-step process, including i) managing search results and removing duplicates, ii) title and abstract screening, and iii) full text screening. The extracted data will be presented in table form and narrative summary, aligning with the objectives and scope of this review.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.085 | 0.063 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.015 | 0.012 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.020 | 0.019 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.086 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".