MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evaluating Fat Free Mass Index For Sport Specific Performance Goals In Female Collegiate Athletes

2020· article· en· W3041109209 on OpenAlexaff
Louis-Philip Marc-Antoine Guindon, Patrick Delisle-Houde, Jessica A. Insogna, Adriana P. Sólomon, Ross E. Andersen

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Composition Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAthletesLean body massBone mineralMedicinePhysical therapyFat massBody mass indexField hockeyPopulationAnimal scienceInternal medicineOsteoporosisBody weightFootballBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fat free mass index (FFMI) in an athletic female population is computed as (bone mineral content + lean mass / height2). It has been associated with performance and training status in their relevant sport, collegiate female athletes need to optimize bone mineral density (BMD), and lean mass as multiple factors impact their levels, including: the type of sport, nutrition, menstrual cycle, training program variation, lifestyle habits, and genetics. PURPOSE: To compare FFMI and lower body BMD across female collegiate athletes and sedentary control considering their desired sport-specific performance and training. METHODS: A sample of 68 women (Mean±SD; Age: 20.89±1.91 yrs, Height: 1.65±0.07 m, and Weight: 62.25±10.11 kg) including 43 females collegiate athletes (n= 23 hockey players, n= 20 synchronize swimmers) and 25 sedentary university students received a scan using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). ANOVA was used to evaluate differences in: FFMI, and regional BMD in the spine and the femur. RESULTS: The FFMI of hockey players (18.11±1.33 kg/m2), was significantly (p<.05) higher than both the synchronized swimmers (15.43±1.25 kg/m2) and the controls (14.99±1.45 kg/m2). Hockey players, compared to synchronized swimmers and the control group, have a higher BMD of the spine, F(2, 65) = 13.391, p<.05, FFMI, F(2, 66)=37.06, p<.05. BMD of the total femur in the hockey players was great than the controls, F(2, 65)=4.06, p<.05. Total lean mass of synchronized swimmers (40.77±3.67 kg,) was greater (p<.05) than the control group (36.65±5.30kg). CONCLUSION: BMD and FFMI of the control group compared to female athletes show how sports’ demands influence bone’s health in a female collegiate population. BMD and FFMI of hockey players compared to synchronized swimmers may demonstrate the importance of percussive activities for bone health in female athletes. Differences in FFMI between female hockey players and synchronize swimmers suggest that establishing sport-specific norms in this new measure may help coaches and strength specialists better tailor training programs to optimize performance and bone health in varsity athletes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicBody Composition Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207