MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Status of Foreign Advanced Pasture Water Supply Technology

2020· article· en· W3041153839 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xingtian Wang, Junfeng Zhu, Liang Cao, Shifeng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPastureWater supplyEnvironmental scienceWater balanceGrasslandAnimal husbandryEnergy supplyAgroforestryAgricultural engineeringEnvironmental engineeringGeographyAgricultureAgronomyEngineering

Abstract

Abstract Pasture water supply is of great significance for rational management of grassland, maintaining grassland ecological balance and promoting the development of animal husbandry. The investigation of international advanced pasture water supply technology has important reference value for the development of science, technology and economy in domestic pasture area. The advanced pasture water supply technology in the United States, Canada and Holland was summarized and analyzed through the literature retrieval with database. And the current situation of water supply technology in typical pastures of China was investigated and summarized through the field investigation of the Inner Mongolia pasture and the visit of the local herdsmen. The foreign pasture advanced water supply technology of Fresh Water Mill, batteryless photovoltaic water supply system, stand-alone mixed energy supply system, wireless data collection system of remote water supply system, automatic constant temperature water supply system and automatic water supply control system for pasture are put forward in accordance with the characteristics of pasture in China.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

How this classification was reachedexpand

The three-model screen

all 5,600 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: about_only · design weight: 3321.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Survey of pasture water-supply technologies; an agricultural engineering review of technology, not of research.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

The object is pasture water-supply technology and its applications, not research.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: other
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Technical survey of pasture water-supply systems; literature is used for domain technology, not studied as research.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicEnvironmental and Agricultural SciencesFrench-language works237,207