Performance of Overset Mesh in Modeling the Wake of Sharp-Edge Bodies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The wake dynamics of sharp-edge rigid panels is examined using Overset Grid Assembly (OGA) utilized in OpenFOAM, an open-source platform. The OGA method is an efficient solution technique based on overlap of a single or multiple moving grids on a stationary background grid. Five test cases for a stationary panel at different angle of attack are compared with available computational data, which show a good agreement in predicting global flow variables, such as mean drag. The models also provided accurate results in predicting the main flow features and structures. The flow past a pitching square panel is also investigated at two Reynolds numbers. The study of surface pressure distribution and shear forces acting on the panel suggests that a higher streamwise pressure gradient exists for the high Reynolds number case, which leads to an increase in lift, whereas the highly viscous effects at low Reynolds number lead to an increased drag production. The wake visualizations for the stationary and pitching motion cases show that the vortex shedding and wake characteristics are captured accurately using the OGA method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it