Comparaison de systèmes de traduction automatique pour la post édition des alertes météorologique d'Environnement Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce mémoire a pour but de déterminer la stratégie de traduction automatique des alertes météorologiques produites par Environnement Canada, qui nécessite le moins d’efforts de postédition de la part des correcteurs du bureau de la traduction. Nous commencerons par constituer un corpus bilingue d’alertes météorologiques représentatives de la tâche de traduction. Ensuite, ces données nous serviront à comparer les performances de différentes approches de traduction automatique, de configurations de mémoires de traduction et de systèmes hybrides. Nous comparerons les résultats de ces différents modèles avec le système WATT, développé par le RALI pour Environnement Canada, ainsi qu’avec les systèmes de l’industrie GoogleTranslate et DeepL. Nous étudierons enfin une approche de postédition automatique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".