MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041323680 · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01594

Burkholderia cepacia Complex Taxon K: Where to Split?

2020· article· en· W3041323680 on OpenAlexafffund
Eliza Depoorter, Evelien De Canck, Charlotte Peeters, Anneleen D. Wieme, Margo Cnockaert, James E. A. Zlosnik, John J. LiPuma, Tom Coenye, Peter Vandamme

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Microbiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeVlaamse regeringUniversiteit GentCystic Fibrosis CanadaUniversity of OxfordVlaams Supercomputer CentrumWellcome TrustCystic Fibrosis Foundation
KeywordsCladeMultilocus sequence typingBiologyBurkholderia cepacia complexTaxonPhylogenetic treePhylogeneticsMicrobiologyBurkholderiaGeneticsGenotypeEcologyBacteriaGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of the present study was to provide an updated classification for Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) taxon K isolates. A representative set of 39 taxon K isolates were analyzed through multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and phylogenomic analyses. MLST analysis revealed the presence of at least six clusters of sequence types (STs) within taxon K, two of which contain the type strains of Burkholderia contaminans (ST-102) and Burkholderia lata (ST-101), and four corresponding to the previously defined taxa Other Bcc groups C, G, H and M. This clustering was largely supported by a phylogenomic tree which revealed three main clades. Isolates of B. contaminans and of Other Bcc groups C, G and H represented a first clade which generally shared average nucleotide identity (ANI) and average digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) values at or above the 95-96% ANI and 70% dDDH thresholds for species delineation. A second clade consisted of Other Bcc group M bacteria and of four B. lata isolates and was supported by average ANI and dDDH values of 97.2% and 76.1% within this clade and average ANI and dDDH values of 94.5% and 57.2% towards the remaining B. lata isolates (including the type strain), which represented a third clade. We therefore concluded that isolates known as Other Bcc groups C, G and H should be classified as B. contaminans, and propose a novel species, Burkholderia aenigmatica sp. nov., to accommodate Other Bcc M and B. lata ST-98, ST-103 and ST-119 isolates. Optimized MALDI-TOF MS databases for the identification of clinical Burkholderia isolates may provide correct species-level identification for some of these bacteria but would identify most of them as B. cepacia complex. MLST facilitates species-level identification of many taxon K strains but some may require comparative genomics for accurate species-level assignment. Finally, the inclusion of Other Bcc groups C, G and H into B. contaminans affects the phenotype of this species minimally and the proposal to classify Other Bcc group M and B. lata ST-98, ST-103 and ST-119 strains as a novel Burkholderia species is supported by a distinctive phenotype, i.e. growth at 42°C and lysine decarboxylase activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MicrobiologySame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207