MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041375071 · doi:10.1007/s00415-020-10059-3

Behr syndrome and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a family with a novel UCHL1 deletion

2020· article· en· W3041375071 on OpenAlexafffund
Grace McMacken, Hanns Lochmüller, Boglárka Bánsági, Angela Pyle, Angela Lochmüller, Patrick F. Chinnery, Steven Laurie, Sergi Beltrán, Leslie Matalonga, Rita Horváth

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
FundersFP7 HealthH2020 European Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchLily FoundationCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaNewton FundWellcome TrustMedical Research CouncilWellcome
KeywordsMedicineAtaxiaExome sequencingHypertrophic cardiomyopathyCardiomyopathyAtrophyPathologyPediatricsGeneticsCardiologyHeart failureMutationBiologyGenePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Behr syndrome is a clinically distinct, but genetically heterogeneous disorder characterized by optic atrophy, progressive spastic paraparesis, and motor neuropathy often associated with ataxia. The molecular diagnosis is based on gene panel testing or whole-exome/genome sequencing. METHODS: Here, we report the clinical presentation of two siblings with a novel genetic form of Behr syndrome. We performed whole-exome sequencing in the two patients and their mother. RESULTS: Both patients had a childhood-onset, slowly progressive disease resembling Behr syndrome, starting with visual impairment, followed by progressive spasticity, weakness, and atrophy of the lower legs and ataxia. They also developed scoliosis, leading to respiratory problems. In their late 30's, both siblings developed a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and died of sudden cardiac death at age 43 and 40, respectively. Whole-exome sequencing identified the novel homozygous c.627_629del; p.(Gly210del) deletion in UCHL1. CONCLUSIONS: The presentation of our patients raises the possibility that hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may be an additional feature of the clinical syndrome associated with UCHL1 mutations, and highlights the importance of cardiac follow-up and treatment in neurodegenerative disease associated with UCHL1 mutations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurologySame topicGenomics and Rare DiseasesFrench-language works237,207