MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041510586 · doi:10.1142/s1793431120400047

Experimental Investigations of Hydraulic Surges Passing Over a Rectangular Canal

2020· article· en· W3041510586 on OpenAlexaff
Nuri Elsheikh, Amir H. Azimi, Ioan Nistor, Abdolmajid Mohammadian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Earthquake and Tsunami · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEarthquake and Tsunami Effects
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurgeTurbulenceGeologyMechanicsGeotechnical engineeringGeometryPhysicsMathematicsGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this experimental study was to investigate the effects of a rectangular canal on the hydrodynamics of turbulent surges before and after the canal by implementing a series of physical experiments. A dam-break wave model was used to simulate the tsunami-like turbulent waves passing over a smooth and horizontal surface, in the presence and absence of a canal. Three canal depths of [Formula: see text], 0.10 and 0.15[Formula: see text]m were used to model shallow, moderate and deep conditions and three canal widths of [Formula: see text], 1.60 and 3.0[Formula: see text]m were selected to model narrow to wide canals. The front velocity of the dam-break induced surges were controlled by rapidly releasing upstream impounded set volumes of water with depths of [Formula: see text], 0.30 and 0.40[Formula: see text]m. The dam-break wave propagation over a horizontal, dry and smooth bed revealed four regimes describing the variations of surge height with time. The arrival time to reach the maximum surge height and the quasi steady-state regime was correlated with each impoundment depth and an empirical formulation was proposed to estimate the onset of the quasi steady-state flow. The maximum surge heights measured before and after the mitigation canal location were compared with those recorded in the corresponding tests without the presence of the canal. It was found that the peak surge height upstream of the canal could increase up to 40% compared to the test without the presence of the canal in relatively small impoundment depth and in presence of a narrow canal due to momentum dissipation. The wave height downstream of the canal increased between 10% and 50% of the wave height without the presence of the canal and the minimum change in the wave height occurred for the canal width to depth ratio of 20. The time-history of surge velocity after the mitigation canal indicated a significant decay of between 40% and 60% in the presence of a canal due to the bed friction changes and momentum dissipation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Earthquake and TsunamiSame topicEarthquake and Tsunami EffectsFrench-language works237,207