MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Emerging Aspects of Photo-catalysts (TiO2 & ZnO) Doped Zeolites and Advanced Oxidation Processes for Degradation of Azo Dyes: A Review

2020· review· en· W3041621311 on OpenAlexaff
Syed Makhdoom Hussain, Tabassum Hussain, Moeen Faryad, Qasim Ali, Shafaqat Ali, Muhammad Rizwan, Abdullah Ijaz Hussain, Madhumita B. Ray, Shahzad Ali Shahid Chatha

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Analytical Chemistry · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotocatalysisPhotodegradationCatalysisDegradation (telecommunications)CalcinationChemistryMaterials scienceChemical engineeringPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Azo dyes are recognized as non-decomposable and recalcitrant compounds and can be depleted into more dangerous secondary products in anaerobic environments. In the current scenario, different water treatment strategies, including adsorption, photocatalysis, and advanced oxidation processes based practices, are facing different limitations. Method: A literature survey was accomplished by searching the scientific data from different search engines, including Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Springer, Taylor and Francis, Google Scholar, Blackwell-Synergy, Wiley-Interscience and Research-Gate, etc. This article has been compiled after intensively reviewing about 231 research papers, reviews, and book chapters in the fields of industrial effluents, hazardous materials, and water treatment strategies with their advantages and limitations. Results: Molecular oxygen and other active species, such as O2•−, HO2•, H2O2, and •OH, play a significant role in the degradation of dyes in AOPs and photocatalyst utilizes sunlight energy and accelerates some chemical reactions depending upon the activation energies. Different reaction parameters, including calcination temperature, pH, initial dye concentration, and catalyst dosage, have a significant impact on photocatalytic degradation performance. Characterization of degradation processes of dye-stuffs could be carried out by the state-of-the-art analytical techniques i.e. UV-Visible spectroscopy, powdered XRD, FTIR (ATR), EDX-SEM, BET, and differential pulse voltammetry. GC-MS and LC-MS investigation of photodegradation by-products and intermediates could provide identification and possible degradation pathway for target dye molecules. This review covers research related to photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes by TiO2 and ZnO, widely used photocatalysts, and various combinations of zeolites. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the combination of nano-sorbents (Fly Ash Zeolites) and photocatalysts not only enhances the degradation but also effectively removes toxic dye molecules and their by-products. The review explains the suitability of synergic applications of catalysts (TiO2, ZnO) and catalytic bed (zeolites) for different industrial effluents and waste water treatment at a significant pace towards green technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Analytical ChemistrySame topicWater Quality Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207