MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041748669 · doi:10.1144/jgs2020-029

Central sagging of a giant mafic intrusion: the Ediacaran Sept Îles Layered Intrusion (Québec, Canada)

2020· article· en· W3041748669 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Olivier Bolle, Hervé Diot, William Fransen, Michael D. Higgins

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Geological Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
KeywordsMaficGeologyIntrusionGeochemistryLayered intrusionPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility data validated by image analysis were acquired on the Sept Îles Layered Intrusion. Most data come from the mafic Layered Series of the intrusion, although the overlying anorthositic Upper Border Series and felsic Upper Series were also investigated. In the Layered Series, Type 1 magnetic fabric defined by gently to moderately dipping foliations and horizontal to moderately plunging lineations dominates over Type 2 fabric characterized by steeply dipping magnetic foliations and lineations of variable plunge, although steep on average. The inverse relationship holds true for the Upper Border Series and only Type 1 fabric occurs in the Upper Series. Several observations, mainly centripetal disposition of the igneous layering, and inclination of the mean Type 1 foliation and lineation towards the deepest point of the intrusion, near its centre, demonstrate post-cumulus, central sagging of the Layered Series. The Type 2 fabric recorded the effect of synmagmatic discontinuities, possibly shear zones, in the Layered Series, its origin being speculative in the Upper Border Series. The mean Type 1 lineations of the Layered Series and the Upper Series are discordant, suggesting that the latter was slightly affected by the sagging of the underlying cumulates, possibly owing to its rapid waning. Supplementary material: Analytical methods (Appendix 1) and equal-area projections of the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility principal axes (Appendix 2) are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5057499.v1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Geological SocietySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207