MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041794894 · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.07.005

Intestinal Virome Signature Associated With Severity of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

2020· article· en· W3041794894 on OpenAlexaff
Sonja Lang, Münevver Demir, Anna Martin, Lu Jiang, Xinlian Zhang, Yi Duan, Bei Gao, Hilmar Wisplinghoff, Philipp Kasper, Christoph Roderburg, Frank Tacke, Hans‐Michael Steffen, Tobias Goeser, Juan G. Abraldeṣ, Xin Tu, Rohit Loomba, Peter Stärkel, David T. Pride, Derrick E. Fouts, Bernd Schnabl

Bibliographic record

VenueGastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismAstraZenecaAllerganNational Institutes of HealthFerring Research InstituteMarga und Walter Boll-StiftungNovo NordiskDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of Veterans AffairsUniversity of California, San DiegoCymaBay TherapeuticsBoehringer IngelheimSiemens USABristol-Myers SquibbNGM BiopharmaceuticalsPfizerUniversité Catholique de LouvainIntercept PharmaceuticalsGilead SciencesUniversität zu KölnAxial BiotherapeuticsU.S. Department of DefenseBiomedical Laboratory Research and Development, VA Office of Research and Development
KeywordsNonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseHuman viromeInternal medicineMicrobiomeGastroenterologyConfidence intervalMedicineCirrhosisDried blood spotLiver diseaseFibrosisFatty liverMetagenomicsDiseaseBiologyBioinformaticsGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations206
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueGastroenterologySame topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207