MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Does The Mixed Relay Triathlon Affect Respiratory Function In Healthy Junior Triathletes?

2020· article· en· W3041811387 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael D. Kennedy, Scott C. Forbes, João Henrique Falk Neto

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpirometryMedicineVital capacityBronchoconstrictionVentilation (architecture)Physical therapyRespiratory minute volumeAsthmaInternal medicineCardiologyRespiratory systemLung functionDiffusing capacityLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a transient narrowing of the airway that can be attributed to heavy ventilation associated with sustained high intensity exercise greater than 8 min. High aerobic and ventilatory training demands can exacerbate the EIB response and lead to prevalence of EIB in endurance athletes like triathletes. The mixed relay triathlon, due to its high intensity and short duration format, will induce heavy ventilation that could lead to EIB. However, no research at present has determined the influence of a mixed relay on respiratory function and baseline spirometry measures which influence EIB. PURPOSE: To determine severity and prevalence of EIB in healthy triathletes competing in a mixed relay and understand if baseline spirometry is predictive of the EIB response and race performance. METHODS: Seven males (17.7 ± 0.4 years, 183.7 ± 3.0 cm) and 5 females (17.6 ± 0.6 years, 171.1 ± 2.7 cm) competed in the Canadian Championships (300m swim, 6km bike, 1.6km run). Spirometry measures of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 sec (FEV1), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC (%), Forced Expiratory Flow at 50% FVC (FEF50), FEF 25-75% and Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) was performed before warm up and 5 min post-race. Measures were calculated as % delta change (for EIB determination) and in raw units to determine pre-post differences in measures via paired sample t-tests. RESULTS: Mean race time was 22.4 ± 1.5 min including transitions (swim 4.5 ± 0.5 min, bike 10.4 ± 0.7 min, run 6.1 ± 0.6 min). No spirometry measure was significantly decreased post-race. One athlete had mild EIB (% decrease in FEV1 between 10 and 25%) and 2 athletes had a baseline FEV1/FVC ratio <0.7. Percent delta change in PEF and FEF 25-75% were correlated to finish time (r=-0.78, r=-0.83, p<0.05 respectively). CONCLUSION: An all-out 20 min ultra-short triathlon does not negatively affect respiratory function in young healthy junior triathletes. It maybe that the decrease in PEF and FEF 25-75 affected finish time due to reduced airway function affecting exercise intensity. The low prevalence of EIB compared to older endurance athletes supports the late onset of EIB in endurance athletes (> 25 years) although the 2 athletes with <0.7 resting FEV1/FVC ratios show signs of underlying airway obstruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research→French-language works237,207→