MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Supervised Physical Activity Is Important To Counteract Negative Impacts Of Cancer On Physical Activity Behavior

2020· article· en· W3041819520 on OpenAlexaff
Maxime Caru, Daniel Curnier, Ariane Lévesque, Serge Sultan, Valérie Marcil, Caroline Laverdière, Daniel Sinnett, Lucía Romo, Laurence Kern

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical activityPsychosocialContext (archaeology)CancerPhysical fitnessMedicinePsychologyGerontologyPhysical therapyInternal medicinePsychiatryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The theory of planned behavior (TPB) is used to document children’s psychological parameters linked to their physical activity practice to better understand their physical activity behavior. The TPB model evaluates the informational and motivational parameters that contribute to the practice of physical activity. This study aimed to assess the evolution of children’s physical activity levels (MVLPA) during the first months of their cancer, in addition to document the evolution of TPB measures, self-reported fitness and self-esteem in the physical domain to better understand children’s physical activity behavior. METHODS: A total of 16 children (8 boys and 8 girls) with cancer were recruited in the context of the VIE (Valorization, Implication and Education) study. Patients answered psychosocial questionnaires at their diagnosis of cancer (time 1), six to eight weeks following their diagnosis (time 2) and six weeks after the physical activity program (time 3). The physical activity program was composed of two physical activity sessions (≃45min) per week for six weeks at moderate intensity. The integration of the family in the physical activity process was taken into consideration. RESULTS: A significant decrease of 41.2min/day of daily MVLPA was observed between the time at cancer diagnosis (50.5±32.8min/day) and six to eight weeks after the first interview (9.3±9.1min/day). After the physical activity program (23.1±10.8min/day), we observed a significant increase of 13.8 min/day of daily MVLPA. We found that time after the diagnosis of cancer negatively impacted children’s TPB measures (mean in attitude, injunctive norms, identity, facilitating factors, self-confidence and intention) and MVLPA levels, while that the time after the physical activity program positively impacted children’s TPB measures (mean in attitude, injunctive norms, identity, facilitating factors, self-confidence and intention) and MVLPA levels. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need to provide children with physical activity support as soon as the cancer is diagnosed and shows the importance of familial support by injunctive norms to improve children’s physical activity behavior. These findings help to better understand the effect of cancer diagnosis on children’s physical activity behavior

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→