MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

12-week Of Tai Chi Training Improves Cognitive Function In Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment

2020· article· en· W3041855679 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Angus P. Yu, Ray Yiu Pan Wong, Edwin C. Chin, Danny Ju Cheng Yu, Parco M. Siu

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMedicineDementiaMemory spanCognitionRandomized controlled trialPhysical therapyCognitive declinePercentileCognitive impairmentGerontologyWorking memoryInternal medicinePsychiatryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manifestation of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an early sign indicative of accelerated decline in cognitive function during ageing that precedes the development of dementia. Its prevalence rate in older adults in China (≥ 60) ranges from 10% to 20%. To date, there is no documented pharmacological intervention for dementia. Preliminary studies, however, have shown that exercise can improve cognitive function. PURPOSE: This study aims to examine the effectiveness of Tai Chi training in improving cognitive function in older adults with MCI. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted between October, 2018 and May, 2019. In this two-arm, single-blinded randomized controlled trial, 20 Chinese adults aged ≥50 years with MCI [Score of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Hong Kong Version (MoCA-HK) below 7th percentile of the age and education-corrected normative data of Hong Kong] were randomly assigned to Control (CON, n=10, received no intervention) and Tai Chi (TC, n=10, received 12-week Tai Chi training) groups. Global cognitive function was the primary outcome which was assessed by MoCA-HK 12 weeks after post-randomization. Secondary outcomes including executive function, working memory, long term memory, and attention were assessed by trial making test A and B, digit span, 30-min delay recall test and attention network test respectively. Data were analyzed by generalized linear model with baseline as covariate. RESULTS: TC provoked a robust improvement in MoCA-HK score compared with CON (TC: +24% vs CON: +9%, P<0.001). TC participants also performed better in 30-min delay recall (TC: +52% vs CON: +8%, P=0.005) and trial making test B/A ratio compared with CON (TC: -21% vs CON: -2%, P=0.028). No statistical difference was observed in forward and back digit span. There was no statistical difference in reaction time, accuracy, alerting network and orienting network between the two groups. However the change in executive network was significantly different between TC and CON (TC: +19% vs CON: -24%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A 12-week Tai Chi training can improve global cognitive function in older adults with MCI. Tai Chi improves executive function and long-term memory and alters the attention network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→