Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to introduce the pedagogical piano repertoire of Alexina Louie (1949~), as well as to examine how she projected Oriental elements into her music. Louie, a female Chinese-Canadian composer drew her inspiration from the Eastern features of Chinese philosophy, Yin-yang (陰陽), and music for the Chinese ancient string instrument, Guqin (古琴). Two of her most notable pedagogical piano series include four pieces for Music for Piano (1982) that were dedicated to her teacher, Jean Lyons, and nine pieces for Star Light, Star Bright (1995) that were dedicated to two of her daughters, Jasmine and Jade. These very valuable pieces for intermediate and advanced students will help develop a student’s musical expression and creativity in the Contemporary musical style. Some of the unique musical features that appear in these pieces include senza misura, expanded staves, oversized natural and flat signs, chord clusters with open palms, grace notes and grouping with slash, etc. In particular, one can see that she wanted to give pianists the freedom to express their musical ideas, explore colorful sounds and their imagination fully, instead of playing mechanically and prosaically. No study of Louie''s pedagogical piano works has been introduced yet in South Korea. I hope that many of our young Korean pianists have the opportunity to learn and explore Louie’s wonderful pieces, and expand their musical sensibility and imagination as a result.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".