MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041892310 · doi:10.26452/ijrps.v11i3.2375

Innovative methodologies for identification and qualification of Impurities: An overview of the latest trends on impurity profiling

2020· article· en· W3041892310 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G Nishanth, G Akhila, Anandkumar Tengli, R. S. Chandan, K Suraj, R Maruthi, N Akshay

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActive ingredientImpurityProfiling (computer programming)DrugPharmaceutical manufacturingBiochemical engineeringPharmaceutical industryPharmaceutical drugNanotechnologyChemistryMedicineMaterials scienceComputer sciencePharmacologyOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Impurity profiling is known to identify, classify and measure both the identified and non-identified contamination present on the medicinal product. Unwanted chemicals which remain or are created during the formulation of medicinal products are pharmaceutical impurities. Impurity profiling helps in the detection, recognition and quantification in bulk products and pharmaceutical formulations of various types of impurities, as well as residual solvents. It is the simplest way to distinguish consistency and stability of bulk drugs and medication formulations. As analytical methodology has developed rapidly, it is essential to consider with their solutions problems related to impurities of drug substances and drug products. Various regulatory agencies including ICH, USFDA, Canadian Drug and Health Agencies stress the criteria for purity and for detecting impurities in active pharmaceutical materials, even in small quantities, as the presence of impurities, may have an effect on pharmaceutical products ’ efficacy and health. Therefore, the study focuses on various analytical methods for identification and quantification of impurities in pharmaceutical products to clarify the need for impurity profiling on drug products in pharmaceutical research. To drug regulators, the product substance’s impurity profile is a reliable fingerprint to prove that the manufacturing process of bulk drug substances is consistent in quality. The study gives a short summary of recent technical developments in the profiling of pharmaceutical products including pharmaceutical active ingredients as well as pharmaceutical products during 2013-2017. Such recent trends in the profiling of impurities have been addressed in the study. This focuses specifically on a thorough update on various analytical techniques, including hyphenated methods to define and measure thresholds in specific pharmaceutical matrices of impurities and degradants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0090.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.785
GPT teacher head0.679
Teacher spread0.106 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical SciencesSame topicAnalytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsFrench-language works237,207