MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041900654 · doi:10.1039/d0sc01518k

Highly efficient H<sub>2</sub>S scavengers<i>via</i>thiolysis of positively-charged NBD amines

2020· article· en· W3041900654 on OpenAlexaff
Ismail Ismail, Zhuoyue Chen, Lu Sun, Xiuru Ji, Haishun Ye, Xueying Kang, Haojie Huang, Haibin Song, Sarah G. Bolton, Zhen Xi, Michael D. Pluth, Long Yi

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSulfur Compounds in Biology
Canadian institutionsImpact
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNatural Science Foundation of Beijing MunicipalityNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsThiolysisChemistryComputational chemistryOrganic chemistryCombinatorial chemistryStereochemistryAntioxidant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate that positively-charged NBD amines can effectively scavenge biological H <sub>2</sub> S in live cells and in mice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ScienceSame topicSulfur Compounds in BiologyFrench-language works237,207