Transcriptome-wide association study for restless legs syndrome identifies new susceptibility genes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common neurological condition, with a prevalence of 5-15% in Central Europe and North America. Although genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified some common risk regions for RLS, the causal genes have yet to be fully elucidated. We conducted a transcriptome-wide association study involving 15,126 RLS cases and 95,725 controls, from the most recent meta-analysis of GWAS, and gene expression weights of GTEx v7 and the CMC dorsolateral prefrontal cortex tissue panels. We identified 13 associations (in 8 independent loci) at the transcriptome-wide significant level, of which 6 were not implicated in the previous GWAS: SKAP1, SLC36A1, CCDC57, FN3KRP, NCOA6/TRPC4AP. A fine-mapping approach prioritized CMTR1, RP1-153P14.5, PRPF6, and PPP3R1 - to our knowledge, the latter of which is the first RLS-associated gene directly implicated in dopaminergic pathways. Overall, our findings highlight the power of integrating gene expression data with GWAS to prioritize putative causal genes for functional follow-up studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it