MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041966217 · doi:10.2118/198997-ms

A Multiscale Data-Driven Forecasting Framework for Optimum Field Development Planning

2020· article· en· W3041966217 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Salehi, Gill Hetz, Soheil Esmaeilzadeh, Feyisayo Olalotiti, David Castiñeira

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCalibrationData miningField (mathematics)Cluster analysisMathematical optimizationMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The process of identifying and performance forecasting of the remaining, feasible, and actionable field development opportunities (FDOs) is the core component of optimum field development planning and management. In the present work, we introduce a multiscale data-driven forecasting framework that applies a series of novel technologies to provide short- and long-term production forecast and optimization for both field and well level performance. Our workflow can be applied to a comprehensive FDO inventory including behind-pipe recompletion, infill drilling, and sidetrack opportunities. Using smart spatio-temporal clustering, we automatically divide the reservoir into a specific number of compartments with distinct static and dynamic properties, in which the direction-dependent multiphase flow communication is a function of nonlocal phase potential differences. The reservoir connectivity structure is encoded in an adjacency matrix describing the neighbor and non-neighbor connections of comprising compartments. We then apply a recently proposed robust Ensemble Smoother Levenberg-Marquardt (rES-LM) method to generate plausible model realizations which replicate the reservoir energy by adjusting first-order model parameters such as pore volumes, fault transmissibilities, aquifer strength, and matrix-fracture split. These calibrated upscaled network models serve as pre-conditioner for a detailed model calibration step. We carry out a second round of full-scale reservoir simulation model calibration, anchoring updates on large-scale model parameters estimated from the network model. Representative models are further improved in a sensitivity-based local inversion step to match multiphase production data at the well-level. This structured, multiscale approach offers improved stability in reservoir model calibration. Finally, calibrated models are directly passed to the forecasting and optimization engine to assess and optimize field opportunities and development scenarios. The proposed workflow is applied to a major fractured offshore field in South America. Leveraging the fast forward model, an efficient ensemble-based history matching framework was applied to reduce the uncertainty of the global reservoir parameters, such as inter-blocks and aquifer-reservoir communications, and fault transmissibilities. The ensemble of history-matched models was then used to provide a probabilistic forecast and optimization for different field development scenarios. A novel hybrid approach is presented in which we couple a physics-based nonlocal modeling framework with data-driven clustering techniques to provide a fast and accurate multiscale modeling of compartmentalized reservoirs. Our approach facilitates a flexible framework to rapidly generate reliable forecasts and quantify associated uncertainties in a robust manner. This advantage in flexibility and robustness is tied to our fast and automated two-stage model calibration workflow that leads to substantial saving in computational time. This research also adds to the literature by presenting a comprehensive work on spatio-temporal clustering for reservoir studies’ applications that consider the clustering complexities, the intrinsic sparse and noisy nature of the data, and the interpretability of the outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering ConferenceSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207