MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3041991411 · doi:10.1107/s1600576720006317

A laboratory transmission diffraction Laue setup to evaluate single-crystal quality

2020· article· en· W3041991411 on OpenAlexaff
Alexiane Arnaud, Wijdène Guediche, Clément Remacha, Edward Roméro, Henry Proudhon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Crystallography · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
FundersAssociation Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie
KeywordsMisorientationOpticsDiffractionCollimated lightOrientation (vector space)Monocrystalline siliconRotation (mathematics)Materials sciencePhysicsComputer scienceOptoelectronicsGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A scanning laboratory Laue transmission setup is developed to probe extended quasi-monocrystalline samples. Orientation mapping is achieved by controlling the collimation of the incident beam and scanning the position of the specimen. An automated indexing algorithm for transmission Laue patterns is presented, together with a forward simulation model adapted for a laboratory setup. The effect of the main parameters of the system is studied with the aim of achieving exposure times of the order of one second. Applications are presented to probe the orientation of an extended part and detect disoriented regions within the bulk. Finally, the analysis of diffraction spot shapes shows that the misorientation within the illuminated volume can be measured, and a new method is proposed to evaluate its complete mean lattice rotation tensor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied CrystallographySame topicX-ray Diffraction in CrystallographyFrench-language works237,207