MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3042006449 · doi:10.3917/agora.085.0023

Comment les pratiques pédagogiques hors les murs interrogent-elles les protocoles de l’intervention sociale ?

2020· article· fr· W3042006449 on OpenAlexaff
Hélène Le Breton, Guillaume Sabin

Bibliographic record

VenueAgora débats/jeunesses · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis le début des années 1980, le réseau des Groupes de pédagogie et d’animation sociale (GPAS) développe en France une pédagogie sociale. Celle-ci s’adresse à des petits groupes de trois ou quatre enfants ou adolescents et déploie ses actions dans l’espace public. Cette pratique hors les murs la distingue de formes d’intervention sociale plus traditionnelles : les pédagogues de rue sont amenés à assumer une grande proximité avec les enfants, les adolescents, leur famille et les relations de réciprocité sont valorisées ; les lieux fréquentés et la diversité des personnes rencontrées dans le territoire de vie et à proximité offrent ainsi une variété de situations qui leur permet de sortir d’un rôle central et normatif.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.239
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.339
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score0.939

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2390.339
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.017
Scholarly communication0.0110.011
Open science0.0040.008
Research integrity0.0100.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.273
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgora débats/jeunessesSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207