MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effect Of 1 Year Of Qigong Exercise On Cognitive Function Among Older Chinese Adults

2020· article· en· W3042127558 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jing Jin, Yin Wu, Shaohua Li, Suhui Jin, Chenglin Zhou, Zhen Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentRepeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological StatusPhysical therapyMedicineCognitionConfidence intervalBonferroni correctionRandomized controlled trialPhysical medicine and rehabilitationNeuropsychologyPsychologyCognitive impairmentInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of a tailored qigong exercise versus stretching and toning exercises in the maintenance of cognitive abilities in Chinese elders at risk of cognitive decline. DESIGN: A 1-year, single-blind, cluster randomized controlled trial. METHOD: Seventy-four older Chinese adults with risk of cognitive decline were enrolled in the study. They were cluster randomized to the qigong group and to the stretching and toning control exercise group. Cognitive and functional performance were assessed at baseline and at 1 year as measured using the Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MoCA) test and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). RESULTS: At 1 year, 25 of 33 participants (75.8%) in the qigong group and 26 of 33 participants (78.8%) in the control group completed the exercise intervention. A bivariate correlation test indicated a good correlation between the MoCA test score and the RBANS total score after the intervention (r = 0.517, p < 0.01). Generalized estimating equations revealed that those in the qigong group had lower risk of progression of cognitive decline at 1 year (odds ratio, 0.314; 95% confidence interval, 0.103-0.961; p = 0.04). Two-way repeated-measures analyses of variance followed by post hoc t-tests with Bonferroni corrections indicated that performances on the MoCA test and the RBANS were significantly better in the qigong group than in the control group for the MoCA score (p < 0.01) and the RBANS cognitive domains of global cognition (p < 0.01), memory (p < 0.01), visuospatial/constructional (p < 0.01), and language (p < 0.01) abilities, but not for attention (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Performance of qigong for 1 year was significantly superior to stretching and toning exercises not only for preventing progression of cognitive decline but also for improving several cognitive functions among older Chinese adults at risk of cognitive decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→