The heuristic model of energy propagation in free space, based on the detection of a current induced in a conductor inside a continuously covered conducting enclosure by an external radio frequency source
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The objective of this study is to propose a heuristic model of energy propagation due to an anomaly; electromagnetic (EM) field penetration into a continuously covered conducting enclosure (Faraday shield) from an external radio frequency source, violating the accepted model in the EM field theory. In this study, at an arbitrarily selected frequency, range of 26.965–1,800 MHz, of an external frequency source, an EM field inside the conducting enclosure was observed, contrary to expectations, which was followed by a systematic examination. Although no induced voltage could be expected inside the enclosure according to the classical theory, the experiment revealed a clear induced voltage inside, an attenuated induced voltage of −18.0 to −1.0 dB (for the range of frequencies 26.965–1,800 MHz) was observed. Hence, these results apparently contradict the established notion that an EM field cannot penetrate a Faraday shield. Rationalizing these observations and the results of the investigation leads to an alternative model to the existing models of energy propagation in free space. In this model, novel quantities named “I-Spin-energy” and “I-Spin-energy field” are defined to replace the concept of electric and magnetic fields in the classical EM theory. The proposed I-Spin-energy model is capable of explaining the unexpected presence of the EM field inside the Faraday shield as well as the induction of an alternating current in a conductor placed inside a Faraday shield along with other existing observations in physics such as those in famous Young’s double-slit experiment on interference of light, which provided the basis for the wave theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".