MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Analysis of DNM3 and VAMP4 as genetic modifiers of LRRK2 Parkinson’s disease

2020· review· en· W3042428361 on OpenAlexaff
Emmeline Brown, Cornelis Blauwendraat, Joanne Trinh, Mie Rizig, Mike A. Nalls, Etienne Léveillé, Jennifer A. Ruskey, Hallgeir Jonvik, Manuela Tan, Sara Bandrés‐Ciga, Sharon Hassin‐Baer, Kathrin Brockmann, Jon Infante, Eduardo Tolosa, Mario Ezquerra, Sawssan Ben Romdhan, Mustapha Benmahdjoub, Mohamed Arezki, Chokri Mhiri, John Hardy, Andrew Singleton, Roy N. Alcalay, Thomas Gasser, Donald G. Grosset, Nigel Williams, Alan Pittman, Ziv Gan‐Or, Rubén Fernández‐Santiago, Alexis Brice, Suzanne Lesage, Matthew J. Farrer, Nicholas Wood, Huw R. Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurobiology of Aging · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Institute on AgingMedical Research CouncilAlzheimer’s Research UKUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDolby Family VenturesRosetrees TrustUniversity College LondonParkinson's UKUK Dementia Research InstituteNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchAlzheimer's SocietyWellcome Trust
KeywordsLRRK2PenetranceDiseaseGeneticsParkinson's diseaseLinkage disequilibriumPopulationMedicineInternal medicineBiologyAlleleGeneHaplotypePhenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The LRRK2 gene has rare (p.G2019S) and common risk variants for Parkinson's disease (PD). DNM3 has previously been reported as a genetic modifier of the age at onset in PD patients carrying the LRRK2 p.G2019S mutation. We analyzed this effect in a new cohort of LRRK2 p.G2019S heterozygotes (n = 724) and meta-analyzed our data with previously published data (n = 754). VAMP4 is in close proximity to DNM3, and was associated with PD in a recent study, so it is possible that variants in this gene may be important. We also analyzed the effect of VAMP4 rs11578699 on LRRK2 penetrance. Our analysis of DNM3 in previously unpublished data does not show an effect on age at onset in LRRK2 p.G2019S carriers; however, the inter-study heterogeneity may indicate ethnic or population-specific effects of DNM3. There was no evidence for linkage disequilibrium between DNM3 and VAMP4. Analysis of sporadic patients stratified by the risk variant LRRK2 rs10878226 indicates a possible interaction between common variation in LRRK2 and VAMP4 in disease risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurobiology of AgingSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207