MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3042528985 · doi:10.1139/as-2020-0008

The Nunavut Wildlife Management Board’s Community-Based Monitoring Network: documenting Inuit harvesting experience using modern technology

2020· article· en· W3042528985 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Denis Ndeloh Etiendem, Rebecca Jeppesen, Jordan Hoffman, Kyle Ritchie, Beth Keats, Peter Evans, Danielle Quinn

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandVictoria General HospitalNova Scotia Department of AgricultureNunavut Wildlife Management Board
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWildlifeEnvironmental resource managementWildlife managementGeographyCitizen scienceEnvironmental planningEcologyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Community-based monitoring is a promising strategy for collaboratively documenting knowledge that has become increasingly widespread among Indigenous communities, institutions, and governments across the Arctic. In January 2012, the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board launched the Community-Based Monitoring Network (CBMN) to document current Inuit harvesting practices using modern technology by engaging Inuit harvesters in Nunavut who hunt, fish, gather, and observe wildlife. We provide an overview of the CBMN and discuss the challenges and opportunities of integrating data gathered through the CBMN in co-management decision-making. The CBMN has resulted in the collection of 7225 wildlife harvest and 2623 observation records by 85 harvesters in seven communities during 5594 on the land trips covering a combined area of approximately 400 000 km 2 . The CBMN represents a powerful approach to knowledge production by Inuit harvesters that is relevant to wildlife managers and co-management agencies. However, the data collected through the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board’s CBMN neither follow conventional wildlife study scientific standards, nor match the outputs of participatory Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit social science research. Instead, it represents a hybrid form of the types of information typically used in resource management discussions. Although such data can inform decision-making, further work may be necessary to fulfill this potential. Nunalingni uumajunik nauttiqsuaqarniq aturuminaqtuulluni upalungaijautiuvuq katujjillutik titiraqsivalliajut qaujimanirijaujunik taakkualu atuqtauvalliatuinnaliqtut nunaqaqqaaqsimajut nunalinginnit, pilirivingnut, ammalu gavamaujuni ukiuqtaqtulimaami. Jaannuari 2012-ngutillugu, nunavut uumajulirijirjuat katimajingit (NWMB) saqqittilauqsimajut nunalingni uumajunik nauttiqsuaqarnirmut piliriamik (CBMN) titiraqtauvalliaqullugit ullumiujuq inuit angunasugusingit aturlutik uajamuuqtunik ullumi atuqtauvaliqtunik nunavumi inuit angunasukpaktut, iqalugasukpaktut, nuatsivaktut, amma nauttiqsuaqaqpaktut uumajunik. unikkaaqaqattaqtugut qanuittuuninganik nunalingni uumajunik nauttiqsuaqarnirmut piliriangujumik ammalu uqautaullutik aksururnarningit ammalu piviksaujut nuattiqullugit tusagaksanik qaritaujakkut aturlugu nunalingni uumajunik nauttiqsuaqanirmut piliriangujuq atuqtauqattarniarmata aulatsijiuqatigiingujunut isumaliuqasuaqtillugit. nunalingni uumajunik nauttiqsuaqarnirmut pilirianguningagut nuattisimaliqtut tusagaksanik 7,225-nik aujaujuvinirnut ammalu 2,623-ngujut takujaujut titiraqtaullutik 85-ngujunut angunasuktinut 7-ngujuni nunaliujuni 5,594-ngirsurłutik aullaqtillugit nunami katitainnarillugit nuna aullarviusimajuq anginiqaqtigilluni sikkitaullutik kilaamitus 400,000 km2. Nunalingni uumajunik nauttiqsuaqanirmut piliriangujuq kiggaqtuivuq sanngijumik piliriaqarninginnut qaujimanirijaujut nuatautillugit inungnut angunasuktinut taakkua nuataujut atuutiqarniaqtillugit uumajulirinirmut aulatsijiujunut ammalu aulatsijiuqataujut pilirivinginnut. Kisianili, taakkua qaritaujakkut tusagaksat nuataujut nunavut uumajulirijirjuat katimajingita nunalingni uumajunik nauttiqsuaqarnirmut piliriangitigut maliksisimangittuq piusirijanginnik uumajunik qaujisainirivaktangita qaujisaqtimmariujut maliganginnik, ammalu angummatijaungittut saqqitauvaktut inungnut ilauqataujunut inuit qaujimajatuqanginnut inuusirmik qaujisaqtimmarit qaujisainirivaktangannut. Kisianili, kiggaqtuijut ajjigiingittunik tusagaksanik atuqtaugajuktunik tusaumattiarlutik isumaliuqtiujut isumauliqattaqullugit, tamatumunga iqqanaijakkannituinnariaqaqpugut pijariiqtaujunnaqullugu piviksaliangusimajuq.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0340.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArctic ScienceSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207