Canola Proteins Used as Co‐Emulsifiers with Phospholipids Influence Oil Oxidability, Enzymatic Lipolysis, and Fatty Acid Absorption in Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The objective of this study is to formulate and characterize oil‐in‐water emulsions with plant‐derived ingredients only, that is, proteins extracted from canola oil bodies, used as co‐emulsifiers with a canola lecithin, and to assess their suitability for food applications. Using the protein extract increases the chemical stability of rapeseed oil emulsions toward oxidation, based on the delay in conjugated diene formation under accelerated storage conditions, and favors pancreatic lipase activity. Bioaccessibility of rapeseed fatty acids is compared in lymph‐duct‐cannulated rats fed oil or emulsion. Fatty acid absorption by the intestine is increased by 78% when the oil is emulsified with canola proteins as co‐emulsifier: 28.7 mg mL −1 versus 16.1 mg mL −1 for oil ( p < 0.05). In vitro lipolysis results are in overall agreement with fatty acid absorption in vivo. Practical Applications : Results obtained for rapeseed oil emulsified with canola proteins and phospholipids suggest that increased bioaccessibility of n‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids could be offered in vegan food products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".