MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Experimental evidence of the lensing effect suppression for atmospheric black carbon containing brown coatings

2020· article· en· W3042593679 on OpenAlexaff
Vaios Moschos, Martin Gysel‐Beer, Robin L. Modini, Joel C. Corbin, Dario Massabò, Camilla Costa, Silvia Giulia Danelli, Athanasia Vlachou, Kaspar R. Daellenbach, P. Prati, Andrê S. H. Prévôt, Urs Baltensperger, Imad El Haddad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbsorbanceAethalometerAerosolAnalytical Chemistry (journal)WavelengthAbsorption (acoustics)Carbon blackChemistrySpectroscopyMaterials scienceOpticsPhysicsOptoelectronicsChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accounting for the wavelength- and source-dependent optical absorption properties of the abundant light-absorbing organic (brown) carbon (BrC) and the mixing state of atmospheric black carbon (BC) are essential to reduce the large uncertainty in aerosol radiative forcing. Estimation of BrC absorption online by subtraction is highly uncertain and may be biased if not decoupled from the potential BC absorption enhancement (lensing) due to non-refractory (organic and inorganic) coating acquisition. Here, the reported total particulate absorption is based on long-term, filter-based seven-wavelength Aethalometer (AE33 model) data, corrected for multiple scattering effects with Multi-Wavelength Absorbance Analyzer (5λ MWAA) measurements. Using ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy absorbance measurements along with particle size distributions obtained by a scanning mobility particle sizer, we have conducted Mie calculations to assess the importance of source-specific extractable particulate BrC (Moschos et al., 2018) versus BC absorption. For the species-specific optical closure, the wavelength dependence of bare BC absorption is estimated using MWAA measurements upon successive filter extractions to remove the influence of BrC/coatings. The lensing contribution, supported by observations from field-emission scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, is estimated at longer wavelengths using a refined proxy for the BC coating thickness. The approach is validated independently by applying a novel positive matrix factorization-based approach on the calibrated total AE33 absorption data. Based on the observational constraints established in this study, we demonstrate for various distinct case studies that the interplay between lensing and BrC absorption results in lower than expected BC absorption at shorter wavelengths. This indicates that the volume additivity assumption is not valid for particulate absorption by internally mixed heterogeneous atmospheric aerosol populations. These comprehensive experimental analyses verify the BC lensing suppression predicted for simplified core-shell structures containing moderately absorbing BrC (Lack & Cappa, 2010). The implications discussed in this work are relevant for co-emitted species from biomass burning or aged plumes with high BrC to BC mass/absorption ratio. References Moschos, V., Kumar, N. K., Daellenbach, K. R., Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A. S. H., and El Haddad, I.: Source apportionment of brown carbon absorption by coupling ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy with aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Tech. Lett., 5, 302-308, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00118, 2018. Lack, D. A. and Cappa, C. D.: Impact of brown and clear carbon on light absorption enhancement, single scatter albedo and absorption wavelength dependence of black carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4207–4220, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4207-2010, 2010.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→