MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3042720548 · doi:10.14288/1.0388723

Sondage sur la capacité des services institutionnels de gestion des données de recherche : Sommaire

2020· report· fr· W3042720548 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alexandra Cooper, Carol Perry, Andrea Szwajcer, Minglu Wang, Shahira Khair

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typereport
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of GuelphQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Groupe d’experts sur la recherche et l’intelligence (GERI) du réseau Portage a publié un sommaire des résultats de son sondage visant à évaluer l’état actuel des établissements de recherche canadiens dans l’élaboration et l’affectation de ressources humaines, organisationnelles, d’infrastructure et financières pour la gestion des données de recherche sur leur campus. Un dictionnaire de données est inclus en annexe et fournit un résumé de la répartition des réponses à toutes les questions du sondage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.053
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.115
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0530.115
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0210.016
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.640
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainReproducibility
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts→French-language works237,207→